MueAI
Data ScienceGen AILLMTransformers
Pre Training/Self Supervised Tasks

Encoder-Decoder Pre-training for NLP | AI

Explore encoder-decoder pre-training, a foundational AI architecture for sequence-to-sequence NLP tasks like translation and summarization. Learn its text-to-text approach.

Encoder-Decoder Pre-training

Encoder-decoder models have become a foundational architecture in Natural Language Processing (NLP), particularly for sequence-to-sequence tasks such as machine translation, text summarization, and question answering. These models can be extended to a wide variety of NLP tasks by framing every problem in a text-to-text format, where both the input and output are textual data. This approach enables the development of a universal text-to-text system capable of handling multiple NLP tasks with a single model.

1. Introduction to Encoder-Decoder Pre-training

Encoder-decoder models consist of two primary components:

  • Encoder: Processes the input text and generates a hidden, contextualized representation of the input.
  • Decoder: Takes the encoded representation and generates the output text, typically in an autoregressive manner (one token at a time).

By using a consistent input-output text structure, diverse NLP tasks—such as translation, summarization, sentiment analysis, and classification—can be unified into a single framework.

2. Text-to-Text Framework

In this framework, each NLP task is formulated as a transformation from a Source Text to a Target Text.

Source Text → Target Text

The Source Text typically includes:

  1. A task instruction (e.g., "Translate English to French").
  2. The input data for the task.

The Target Text is the expected output for that task.

Examples:

  • Translation:

    • Source: Translate English to French: Hello world!
    • Target: Bonjour le monde!

  • Question Answering:

    • Source: Answer the following question: When was Albert Einstein born?
    • Target: He was born on March 14, 1879.

  • Text Simplification:

    • Source: Simplify the following sentence: The professor, who has published numerous papers, will lecture next week.
    • Target: The experienced professor will give a lecture next week.

  • Translation Scoring:

    • Source: Score the translation from English to Chinese. English: When in Rome, do as the Romans do. Chinese: 人在罗马就像罗马人一样做事。
    • Target: 0.81

This text-to-text format allows framing tasks that are traditionally considered classification or regression as text generation problems.

3. Pre-training Objectives

Encoder-decoder models are often pre-trained using self-supervised objectives that encourage the model to learn robust language representations. Key objectives include:

3.1. Prefix Language Modeling

In this approach, the encoder processes a prefix (the beginning segment) of a sentence. The decoder then autoregressively generates the rest of the sentence based on this encoded prefix.

Example:

  • Input to Encoder: [CLS] The puppies are frolicking
  • Target (Decoder Output): outside the house.

This method differs from traditional causal language modeling by treating the input prefix as a complete chunk rather than predicting token-by-token from the start.

3.2. Masked Language Modeling (MLM)

This objective extends the concept from BERT, where tokens in the input sequence are randomly masked, and the model is trained to predict the original masked tokens.

Example:

  • Input: [CLS] The puppies are [MASK] outside [MASK] house.
  • Target: frolicking the

If all tokens are masked, the model effectively learns full autoregressive generation:

  • Input: [CLS] [MASK] [MASK] [MASK] [MASK] [MASK] [MASK] [MASK]
  • Target: The puppies are frolicking outside the house.

This setup trains the model as a denoising autoencoder:

  • The encoder receives a corrupted input sequence.
  • The decoder reconstructs the clean, original text.

3.3. Span Masking with Sentinel Tokens

Instead of replacing each individual masked word with a [MASK] token, this method replaces entire consecutive spans of text with unique sentinel tokens (e.g., [X], [Y], [Z]).

Example:

  • Input: [CLS] The puppies are [X] outside [Y].
  • Target: [X] frolicking [Y] the house [Z]

This approach is often more efficient as it results in shorter sequences and a more focused learning signal, which can reduce training costs.

4. Denoising Training

The core idea behind many pre-training strategies for encoder-decoder models is denoising. The goal is to train the model to accurately reconstruct an original input sequence from a corrupted version of it.

Let:

  • x be the original input sequence.
  • x_noise be the corrupted input sequence.
  • Model(x_noise) be the output generated by the encoder-decoder model given the corrupted input.

The objective function aims to minimize the difference between the model's reconstruction and the original sequence:

(θ̂, ω̂) = argmax Loss(Model(x_noise), x)

where θ and ω represent the model's parameters. The loss is typically the cross-entropy between the predicted sequence and the true target sequence.

5. Input Corruption Strategies

The effectiveness of pre-training heavily depends on how the input data is corrupted. Various techniques are employed to simulate realistic noise, forcing the model to learn robust patterns and dependencies.

5.1. Token Masking

Randomly replaces a portion of tokens in the input sequence with a special [MASK] symbol. This strategy is inspired by BERT's Masked Language Model.

Example:

  • Original: The puppies are frolicking outside the house.
  • Token Masked: The puppies are [MASK] outside [MASK] house.

5.2. Token Deletion

Randomly removes tokens from the input sequence instead of masking them. This compels the model to infer and reconstruct missing information.

Example:

  • Original: The puppies are frolicking outside the house.
  • Token Deleted: The puppies are outside the house.

5.3. Span Masking

Replaces entire contiguous spans of tokens (segments of one or more tokens) with a single [MASK] symbol or a sentinel token. This can also include masking spans of length zero, effectively inserting a [MASK] between words.

Example:

  • Original: The puppies are frolicking outside the house.
  • Span Masked: The [MASK] puppies are [MASK] house.

5.4. Sentence Reordering

Randomly shuffles the order of sentences within a document. This helps the model learn about document-level coherence and the logical flow of information.

Example:

  • Original: Hard work leads to success. Success brings happiness.
  • Reordered: Success brings happiness. Hard work leads to success.

5.5. Document Rotation

Randomly selects a token as the starting point for the sequence and rotates the entire sequence accordingly. This teaches the model to handle cyclical dependencies and identify the true start of a document.

Example:

  • Original: Hard work leads to success. Success brings happiness.
  • Rotated: leads to success. Success brings happiness. Hard work

6. Multilingual and Cross-lingual Pre-training

To effectively train encoder-decoder models for multilingual tasks, the following practices are adopted:

  • Multilingual Corpus: The training data includes text from multiple languages.
  • Shared Vocabulary: A single vocabulary is used that covers tokens from all languages present in the corpus.

This approach allows models to share representations across languages, enabling cross-lingual understanding and generation capabilities.

7. Fine-Tuning for Downstream Tasks

After unsupervised pre-training, encoder-decoder models are typically fine-tuned on specific downstream NLP tasks using labeled data. The fine-tuning process involves providing task-specific instructions, which can range from:

  • Task-specific short names: e.g., "translate", "summarize".
  • Detailed task descriptions in natural language: e.g., "Translate the following English sentence into German:".

Benefits of Fine-Tuning:

  • Zero-Shot Learning: Models can be applied to unseen tasks by simply modifying the text-based instructions without requiring any gradient updates.
  • Few-Shot Learning: With only a few examples provided in the prompt, the model can adapt to new tasks.
  • Generalization and Transfer: Promotes robust generalization and effective transfer of learned representations across a wide range of NLP applications.

8. Summary of Key Features

FeatureDescription
Model FormatText-to-text (input and output are both textual data).
Pre-trainingUtilizes objectives like Prefix LM, Masked LM, and Denoising Autoencoder.
Corruption MethodsEmploys strategies such as token masking, deletion, span masking, sentence reordering, and document rotation.
Multi-task SupportAchieved through text instructions embedded within the input.
Multilingual SupportTrained with multilingual data and a shared vocabulary.
Fine-tuningAdapts models to specific tasks using task data; enables zero-shot and few-shot learning.

Conclusion

Encoder-decoder pre-training, particularly when leveraging the text-to-text paradigm, provides a unified and powerful approach to handling a wide spectrum of NLP tasks. By employing various self-supervised learning methods, including prefix modeling, masked language modeling, and denoising strategies, these models develop rich, transferable representations. Models like T5 and BART are prominent examples that showcase the success and versatility of this architectural approach in modern NLP.

SEO Keywords

Encoder-decoder models, Text-to-text NLP, Prefix language modeling, Masked language modeling (MLM), Span masking with sentinel tokens, Denoising autoencoder, Input corruption strategies, Multilingual encoder-decoder, Fine-tuning encoder-decoder models, T5, BART models.

Potential Interview Questions

  1. What is the fundamental architecture of an encoder-decoder model in NLP?
  2. How does the text-to-text framework effectively unify diverse NLP tasks?
  3. Explain prefix language modeling and contrast it with traditional language modeling.
  4. Describe masked language modeling (MLM) in the context of encoder-decoder pre-training.
  5. How does span masking with sentinel tokens enhance training efficiency?
  6. Elaborate on the denoising autoencoder objective in encoder-decoder pre-training.
  7. What are the common input corruption strategies used during pre-training?
  8. How do encoder-decoder models handle multilingual and cross-lingual tasks?
  9. What are the key benefits of fine-tuning after encoder-decoder pre-training?
  10. Can you name some popular encoder-decoder models and their primary applications?

Decoder-Only Pre-training: GPT & NLP Architectures Explained

Explore decoder-only pre-training in NLP, the foundation of GPT models. Learn how this Transformer variant generates text token-by-token for advanced AI.

Encoder-Only Pre-training: Contextual NLP Representations

Explore encoder-only pre-training in NLP. Learn how these models create rich, contextualized representations for NLU tasks like text classification and Q&A.